An average with nothing in the middle
A market where 15% of roles are remote sounds like a market in transition — some employers moved, most did not, and the number drifts upward each quarter. The distribution says something else entirely. Sort the 41 cities by the share of listings flagged remote-eligible and the middle of the range is nearly empty: 17 cities sit at exactly zero, 14 sit at half or more, and only ten fall anywhere between 1% and 49%.
The two groups do not look like each other. The highest shares belong to Tunis at 100%, Doha at 92%, Casablanca at 91%, Cairo at 86% and Lisbon at 83%. The zeros belong to London, Paris, Berlin, Amsterdam, New York, San Francisco, Tokyo and Singapore. The cities that built the office economy report the least remote hiring; the cities hiring into a global talent pool report the most.
| City | Remote-flagged | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Tunis | 100% | every listing flagged |
| Doha | 92% | |
| Casablanca | 91% | |
| Cairo | 86% | |
| Lisbon | 83% | |
| Copenhagen | 73% | |
| Milan | 70% | |
| Birmingham | 69% | |
| London | 0% | not one listing flagged |
| Paris | 0% | |
| Berlin | 0% | |
| New York | 0% | |
| San Francisco | 0% | |
| Tokyo | 0% | |
| Singapore | 0% |
Zero does not mean nobody works from home
This is where a number has to be read rather than quoted. The flag counts listings that say so — an employer marking a role remote-eligible in the posting itself. It does not detect a hybrid policy mentioned at interview, a team that works from home three days a week by custom, or a contract that allows it without advertising it.
So a 0% city is not a city without remote work. It is a city where no employer in the current snapshot wrote it down. That is a claim about disclosure, and disclosure is exactly what a job seeker is deciding on: a role that does not say is a role you cannot filter for, cannot plan around, and will not learn about until late. The market is not split between remote and office. It is split between employers who commit in writing and employers who leave it open.
The skills employers name are not the ones you would guess
The same discipline applies to skills. Ranked by how many listings name them, the top two are not tools: Leadership appears in 69 listings and Communication in 40. Together that is more than Python, TypeScript, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator and Accounting combined — 109 against 67.
This is not an argument that technical skill is optional, and the ranking is partly an artefact of how listings are written: "Python" appears where a job needs Python, while "leadership" is written into postings across every function. But it is a fair account of what employers put in the text, and it says something plain about a CV that lists only tools.
- Leadership — 69 listingshuman skill
- Communication — 40 listingshuman skill
- Python — 26 listings
- Project Management — 14 listingshuman skill
- Adobe Photoshop — 12 listings
- TypeScript — 10 listings
- Accounting — 10 listings
- Adobe Illustrator — 9 listings
Concentration, and four days of movement
Supply is not spread evenly across employers either. Stripe alone holds 174 live roles, followed by Datadog at 130, Databricks at 85, Okta at 82 and Block at 77. Those five account for roughly 14% of every open role in the aggregate — five names out of thousands of hiring companies.
The pool is also moving quickly. Our previous edition, four days earlier, read 3,579 openings; today it reads 3,864. That is 285 roles, an 8% rise in four days — a reminder that any snapshot of a job market, including this one, describes a day rather than a season.
What to do with this
If you are searching: treat a missing remote flag as missing information, not as a no, and ask early. Treat a city-level percentage as a measure of local disclosure norms, not of how people actually work there.
If you are hiring: in a market where 17 cities report zero, writing the arrangement into the posting is close to free differentiation. Candidates filter on what is stated. Nothing that is left unsaid gets filtered in.
Every figure here is a page you can open. Start with the market by city and read your own market.
Earlier editions
- · 8 min readA law changed who counts as unemployed in France.French unemployment reached 8.3% in the second quarter of 2026, its highest reading since the pandemic quarter of 2020. INSEE publishes something most coverage leaves out: a decomposition showing that people brought into the count by the 2023 full-employment law account for nearly half of the rise across six quarters. That is not the same as saying the rise is not real - the majority of it comes from a population the law never touched - and holding both facts at once is the whole of this piece.Read the analysis →
- · 7 min readEurope’s unmet need for work is twice its unemployment.Eurostat counts 23.7 million people in the European Union with an unmet need for employment. 12.0 million of them are unemployed. The other 11.7 million are working part-time and want more hours, or want work and are not searching, or are searching and cannot start yet - and the unemployment rate, 5.7%, sees none of them. This is the third edition in a row about a number that leaves people out, and the first about the number built to count them.Read the analysis →
- · 7 min readOne unemployed American per job opening. That is not full employment.The Bureau of Labor Statistics counts 1.0 unemployed person per job opening in the United States - a ratio that has sat between 1.0 and 1.1 for eight straight readings. Yesterday this desk reported the British equivalent at 2.5. The gap is real. What the American number does not say is that anyone who wants a job can have one, and the same release explains why: in the very month the ratio read one-to-one, 7.4 million openings sat unfilled while employers hired 5.3 million people and let 1.8 million go.Read the analysis →