Skip to content
Sign inGet started free

The record · 5 September 2026

Belgium’s youth rate jumped.Poland’s fell.

Two neighbours of Germany, one statistical office, one month. Their overall unemployment rates are far apart and moving little. Their youth rates moved in opposite directions, and one of them moved a long way. Everything below is checkable against the live market.

· 7 min read

+3.4points added to Belgium’s youth unemployment rate in the twelve months to June 2026, from 15.5%: the largest movement of any country in the table, in either direction
3.4%Poland’s overall unemployment rate in July 2026, the second lowest in the European Union behind Czechia, while its youth rate fell from 12.2% to 11.5% over the year
18.9%of young Belgians in the labour market were unemployed in June 2026, nearly one in five, and 3.3 points above the European Union’s 15.6%

One year, two directions

Belgium’s youth unemployment rate stood at 18.9% in June 2026, the latest month it has published. In June 2025 it was 15.5%. That is a rise of 3.4 points in twelve months, and no other country in the exhibit below moved as far in either direction. France, the next largest rise, added 2.2 points. Italy, the largest fall, lost 1.3.

Poland went the other way. Its youth rate was 12.2% in June 2025 and 11.5% in June 2026, a fall of 0.7 points, the third largest in the table after Italy and Spain. The European Union as a whole rose from 15.0% to 15.6%, and the euro area from 14.6% to 15.0%.

So the gap between the two countries widened from 3.3 points to 7.4 points in a year. Twelve months ago a young Belgian in the labour market was somewhat more likely to be unemployed than a young Pole. Now the Belgian rate is more than one and a half times the Polish one.

Provenance: Source
Unemployment rates, June 2026, seasonally adjusted, as a share of the labour force: all ages 15 to 74, then under-25s, then the second divided by the first. Sorted by the youth rate, lowest first. June is the latest month for which Belgium has published a youth rate, and the overall rate is June too, so the multiple divides two figures from the same month. Czechia, which has the lowest overall rate in the Union, is left out because its youth series moved four points between consecutive months, the signature of a small sample.
CountryUnemployment, June 2026Youth unemployment, June 2026Youth rate ÷ overall rate
Germany4.0%7.3%1.83×
Netherlands3.8%8.5%2.24×
Poland3.4%11.5%3.38×
Euro area6.4%15.0%2.34×
European Union6.1%15.6%2.56×
Italy5.8%18.7%3.22×
Belgium6.3%18.9%3.00×
France8.3%21.2%2.55×
Spain10.1%23.4%2.32×

Belgium’s problem is young, not general

Belgium’s overall unemployment rate is unremarkable. It was 6.3% in June, against 6.1% for the Union, and 6.0% in July, the freshest print available, a tenth of a point UNDER the Union’s 6.1%. On the overall rate Belgium ranks 15th of the twenty-seven member states in July: the middle of the table.

Its youth rate is not unremarkable. At 18.9% it is 3.3 points above the Union’s 15.6% and ranks 18th of twenty-seven. The ratio between the two Belgian rates is exactly 3.00: a young person in the Belgian labour market is three times as likely to be unemployed as the labour force as a whole. For the Union the multiple is 2.56.

The rise is youth-specific too. Belgium’s overall rate moved by 0.3 points over the year to June, from 6.0%. Its youth rate moved by 3.4. Whatever happened to young Belgians in the labour market over those twelve months did not happen to Belgians in general.

Poland’s floor

Poland’s overall rate is 3.4%, in June and again in July, the second lowest in the European Union behind Czechia, at 3.2% in June and 3.3% in July. It rose by 0.4 points over the year to June, from 3.0%, and stayed second lowest.

Its youth rate, 11.5%, is the sixth lowest of the twenty-seven and 4.1 points below the Union’s. It fell while the overall rate rose: the opposite of Belgium, where both rose, and the opposite of the Union, where both rose too.

One number cuts against Poland, and it should be read carefully. The multiple between its youth rate and its overall rate is 3.38, the highest in the table, above Belgium’s 3.00. That is arithmetic, not a finding: divide any youth rate by a floor as low as 3.4% and the ratio is large. Germany, with the lowest youth rate in the Union at 7.3%, has a multiple of 1.83; the Netherlands, at 8.5%, has 2.24. Poland’s young are not doing badly. Its labour force as a whole is doing unusually well.

Provenance: SourceWhat a youth unemployment rate measures
  1. The youth unemployment RATE is the number of 15-to-24-year-olds who are unemployed, divided by the number of 15-to-24-year-olds who are IN THE LABOUR FORCE: working, or looking for work and available to start. A student who is not looking for work is in neither the numerator nor the denominator.
  2. Most people aged 15 to 24 are in education. In every country in this table the labour force in that age group is a minority of the age group, so the denominator is small and the rate is large. That is why youth rates run at two and three times overall rates everywhere, and why the multiple in the exhibit is not, by itself, a finding.
  3. Eurostat also publishes a youth unemployment RATIO: unemployed 15-to-24-year-olds as a share of ALL 15-to-24-year-olds. It is far lower everywhere, because the denominator includes the students. This piece does not use it, and does not convert the rate into it.

So "18.9%" means that, of the young Belgians who were working or looking for work in June, nearly one in five was looking and not working. It does not mean that one young Belgian in five is out of work. Both sentences are about the same people, and only the first is what Eurostat counted.

The figure this piece is built on is the most misread number in labour statistics. It is set out here in full so that nothing above it can be read as a statement about young people in general.

What this piece will not tell you

It does not say that one young Belgian in five is out of work. The youth unemployment rate is the share of 15-to-24-year-olds IN THE LABOUR FORCE who are unemployed, and most people that age are in education and in no labour force at all. The definition is printed above because every figure in this piece depends on it.

It names no cause. Belgium’s rate rose by 3.4 points and the series records that and nothing else: not whether more young people started looking, or fewer were hired, or the survey sample shifted. And it is one year measured at two points. Belgium’s youth figure for July has not been published, which is why every youth figure here is June, and a month is a photograph.

And it is not a comparison of Brussels with Warsaw. Every figure is national. Regional unemployment is published once a year, and the desk does not print a year-old figure beside a month-old one.

What the data establishes

  • Belgium’s youth unemployment rate rose from 15.5% in June 2025 to 18.9% in June 2026, 3.4 points, the largest movement of any country in the exhibit in either direction.
  • Poland’s fell from 12.2% to 11.5% over the same twelve months, while the European Union’s rose from 15.0% to 15.6%.
  • Belgium’s overall rate sits at the Union’s average, 6.3% against 6.1% in June and 6.0% against 6.1% in July, while its youth rate is 3.3 points above the Union’s and exactly three times its own overall rate.
  • Poland’s overall rate, 3.4%, is the second lowest in the European Union in both June and July, behind Czechia, despite rising 0.4 points over the year.
  • The gap between the Belgian and Polish youth rates widened from 3.3 points to 7.4 points in a year.

What it does not

  • How many young Belgians or young Poles are out of work. The rate is a share of the young labour force, not of the age group, and most of the age group is in education.
  • Any cause, for any figure here. A rate series records a level at two dates and never why it moved: more entrants, fewer hires and a shifted sample are indistinguishable in it.
  • Anything about Brussels or Warsaw. Every figure is national; regional unemployment is annual and this piece uses none of it.
  • A trend. Each comparison is two points twelve months apart, and Belgium’s youth rate for July has not been published. Nothing here says what the next print will show.
  • That Poland’s higher multiple, 3.38 against Belgium’s 3.00, means a worse market for its young. It means a low floor: Poland’s youth rate is below the Union’s and its overall rate is the second lowest in it.

Method

  1. One source, one series. Every figure is Eurostat’s monthly unemployment rate, une_rt_m, seasonally adjusted, as a percentage of the active population, both sexes, read on 5 September 2026 through the JSON-stat API, which serves it without a key. "Overall" is ages 15 to 74; "youth" is under 25.
  2. ONE MONTH PER TABLE. Belgium has not published a youth rate for July 2026, so every youth figure is June 2026 against June 2025, and the overall rate in the exhibit is June as well, so the multiple divides two figures from the same month. The July overall rate, the freshest print, is quoted in the prose and labelled as July each time it appears.
  3. RANKS ARE AMONG THE TWENTY-SEVEN MEMBER STATES ONLY. Eurostat’s monthly table also carries the United States, Norway, Iceland, Switzerland, Japan, Türkiye, North Macedonia and Bosnia, and they are excluded from every "of twenty-seven" here. Czechia, whose youth series printed 9.8, 8.6, 13.0 and 12.2 in four consecutive months, stays in the rankings and out of the exhibit: a table row would lend it a stability it does not have.
  4. Multiples are computed from the published one-decimal rates and rounded once for display. Germany’s is exactly 1.825 and is printed as 1.83. Belgium’s is exactly 3.00. Point changes are differences of published rates.
  5. "NEARLY ONE IN FIVE" IS 18.9% AGAINST 20.0%, and the piece never writes "one in five". It also never writes "one young Belgian in five": the rate is a share of the young LABOUR FORCE, not of young people, and the definition exhibit says so.
  6. NO CAUSE IS NAMED, and no city. Regional unemployment is published annually and this piece uses none of it; a national June figure and a regional annual one cannot sit in one sentence honestly.

BabZituna scores every job against your profile on six real dimensions, and publishes what it can and cannot measure. See the live market.

The markets in this piece, live

Earlier editions